Re: #correspondencetables - what needs to be done?

Home Messages Hashtags

Chris Mutel #136 After some reflection, Brandon's approach is much more sensible than mine. We would then need to either generate a preliminary vocabulary ourselves, or get one from the #ontology folks. Do we know all possible verbs we want to include? For example, in 1-N mappings do we have a verb for the "default" option? toggle quoted messageShow quoted text On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 14:49, <michele.derosa@bonsai.uno> wrote: Thank you Miguel for starting this hashtag and thanks Chris and Brandon for the inputs. This discussion seems the right place to kick start the Group on Correspondence tables. I have just created a new directory on GitHub for the work of this sub-group. The link to this discussion is mentioned in the Readme file. I am currently working on the deliverable I listed under "Before the Hackathon". You will see the updates in the folder soon. Suggestions and contributions are as always very welcome :) Mic -- ############################ Chris Mutel Technology Assessment Group, LEA Paul Scherrer Institut OHSA D22 5232 Villigen PSI Switzerland http://chris.mutel.org Telefon: +41 56 310 5787 ############################
More All Messages By This Member

Join hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.

Home Messages Hashtags About Features Pricing Updates Terms Help Twitter