|
Re: Hackathon report inputs
Hi Agneta,
How are you? I’ve just returned from holidays. The link you sent me has expired. I’m interested in the report, not sure whether it still makes sense to contribute. What do you
Hi Agneta,
How are you? I’ve just returned from holidays. The link you sent me has expired. I’m interested in the report, not sure whether it still makes sense to contribute. What do you
|
By
Rutger Schurgers
·
#273
·
|
|
Hackathon report inputs
Hi all
I am trying to develop a summary report of the Hackathon. I have just sent an overleaf link to all hackathon participants to kindly update it with a short summary of the tasks completed
Hi all
I am trying to develop a summary report of the Hackathon. I have just sent an overleaf link to all hackathon participants to kindly update it with a short summary of the tasks completed
|
By
Agneta
·
#272
·
|
|
[Hackathon] Schedule for regular follow up meetings
#poll
#schedule
#followup
#vote
By
Agneta
·
#271
·
|
|
Re: #rdf #exiobase #rdfconversion
#rdfconversion
#rdf
#exiobase
Hi all,
I was curious about this as well.
My understanding was that we have all the "metadata" about the type of the flow objects, the activity types, and so on, so now we just need the python to
Hi all,
I was curious about this as well.
My understanding was that we have all the "metadata" about the type of the flow objects, the activity types, and so on, so now we just need the python to
|
By
Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)
·
#270
·
|
|
Re: How does the ontology group support the correspondence table group
#rdf
#correspondencetables
#ontology
Hello hello
During the hackathon we talked about aggregators but I have no idea of how they are implemented. For example, Exiobase documents emissions of "HFC"s while we have characterisation factors
Hello hello
During the hackathon we talked about aggregators but I have no idea of how they are implemented. For example, Exiobase documents emissions of "HFC"s while we have characterisation factors
|
By
Miguel Fernández Astudillo
·
#269
·
|
|
#rdf #exiobase #rdfconversion
#rdfconversion
#rdf
#exiobase
Dear all
Could you please let me know if we have the Exiobase data (HSUT) in RDF format yet ? We have a request for the data from the computer science dept in AAU, who might be further involved in
Dear all
Could you please let me know if we have the Exiobase data (HSUT) in RDF format yet ? We have a request for the data from the computer science dept in AAU, who might be further involved in
|
By
Agneta
·
#268
·
|
|
Re: #evaluation
#evaluation
Sorry for the delay. 11 responses, see below.
Worked well. We should continue doing…
• I guess slack was really easy to work with all participants across different channels. I
Sorry for the delay. 11 responses, see below.
Worked well. We should continue doing…
• I guess slack was really easy to work with all participants across different channels. I
|
By
Massimo Pizzol
·
#267
·
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables : from raw to triplets
#correspondencetables
Interesting, I will have a deeper look when possible.
I was updating the group readme. Should I move the references to the Hackathon somewhere else? it seems that this repo will survive and it will
Interesting, I will have a deeper look when possible.
I was updating the group readme. Should I move the references to the Hackathon somewhere else? it seems that this repo will survive and it will
|
By
Miguel Fernández Astudillo
·
#266
·
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables : from raw to triplets
#correspondencetables
As we are not the only people thinking about these topics, there has
already been a lot of work in this area. It is relatively easy to find
some half-baked implementations in RDF, e.g.
As we are not the only people thinking about these topics, there has
already been a lot of work in this area. It is relatively easy to find
some half-baked implementations in RDF, e.g.
|
By
Chris Mutel
·
#265
·
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables : from raw to triplets
#correspondencetables
Hello hello
lets see if I am getting this right.
Chris, when you say "put metadata systems in their native form into arborist (e.g. ISIC 3, ISIC 4, HS1, NACE, NAICS, CPC)" does that mean "as
Hello hello
lets see if I am getting this right.
Chris, when you say "put metadata systems in their native form into arborist (e.g. ISIC 3, ISIC 4, HS1, NACE, NAICS, CPC)" does that mean "as
|
By
Miguel Fernández Astudillo
·
#264
·
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables : from raw to triplets
#correspondencetables
In this case your example seems fine, you can still say that fbcl is subclass of POWC probably.
you can also say sameAs between POWN and Nuclear, assuming that the only way of producing electricity
In this case your example seems fine, you can still say that fbcl is subclass of POWC probably.
you can also say sameAs between POWN and Nuclear, assuming that the only way of producing electricity
|
By
Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)
·
#263
·
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables : from raw to triplets
#correspondencetables
Thanks Matteo-
It is a bit tricky keeping the class definitions and instances inline
with the idea of `rdf:type` referring to multiple classes - could you
provide an alternative implementation of the
Thanks Matteo-
It is a bit tricky keeping the class definitions and instances inline
with the idea of `rdf:type` referring to multiple classes - could you
provide an alternative implementation of the
|
By
Chris Mutel
·
#262
·
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables : from raw to triplets
#correspondencetables
Hi Chris,
have you checked the very useful examples here:
https://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/skos-and-owl/master.html
In general let's use subsclass of and rdf:type when we know it is a subset or an
Hi Chris,
have you checked the very useful examples here:
https://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/skos-and-owl/master.html
In general let's use subsclass of and rdf:type when we know it is a subset or an
|
By
Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)
·
#261
·
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables : from raw to triplets
#correspondencetables
@Matteo, Bo, Miguel; please comment and correct!
Defining correspondence tables in RDF
Based on my reading of https://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/, I created the following:
@prefix bont:
@Matteo, Bo, Miguel; please comment and correct!
Defining correspondence tables in RDF
Based on my reading of https://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/, I created the following:
@prefix bont:
|
By
Chris Mutel
·
#260
·
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables : from raw to triplets
#correspondencetables
I agree with Chris here.
First, most classifications contain themselves hierarchies, typically indicated by some code convention, such as ISIC 4 "011" being a subclass of "01" and
I agree with Chris here.
First, most classifications contain themselves hierarchies, typically indicated by some code convention, such as ISIC 4 "011" being a subclass of "01" and
|
By
Bo Weidema
·
#259
·
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables : from raw to triplets
#correspondencetables
Thanks Miguel-
It seems clear to me that the first step should be defining the verbs we will use, and the reasons we are using these particular verbs. For example, both OWL and SKOS seem to offer
Thanks Miguel-
It seems clear to me that the first step should be defining the verbs we will use, and the reasons we are using these particular verbs. For example, both OWL and SKOS seem to offer
|
By
Chris Mutel
·
#258
·
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables : from raw to triplets
#correspondencetables
In the future, should manual string matching be too time-consuming, you may consider to get some help from fuzzy string comparison (https://github.com/seatgeek/fuzzywuzzy)
/Romain
In the future, should manual string matching be too time-consuming, you may consider to get some help from fuzzy string comparison (https://github.com/seatgeek/fuzzywuzzy)
/Romain
|
By
romain
·
#257
·
|
|
#correspondencetables : from raw to triplets
#correspondencetables
Dear all
During the Friday meeting we discussed the issue of how to arrive from “raw data” to the data stored in the database. There was some disagreement and I think I did not explain myself
Dear all
During the Friday meeting we discussed the issue of how to arrive from “raw data” to the data stored in the database. There was some disagreement and I think I did not explain myself
|
By
Miguel Fernández Astudillo
·
#256
·
|
|
#rdf #rdfframework #followup #ontology
#rdf
#rdfframework
#followup
#ontology
Hi all,
unfortunately I will not be able to join the call tomorrow.
Here is a quick update on my side:
- The ontology is pretty stable since the hackathon, although there are open issues for
Hi all,
unfortunately I will not be able to join the call tomorrow.
Here is a quick update on my side:
- The ontology is pretty stable since the hackathon, although there are open issues for
|
By
Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)
·
#255
·
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables - Getting to 1.0
#correspondencetables
Dear all
An update on this. Yesterday I created a repo following the python skeleton for the functions that will automate part of the workflow. Its called grafter. I have not had time to work on
Dear all
An update on this. Yesterday I created a repo following the python skeleton for the functions that will automate part of the workflow. Its called grafter. I have not had time to work on
|
By
Miguel Fernández Astudillo
·
#254
·
|