Hi Agneta, How are you? I’ve just returned from holidays. The link you sent me has expired. I’m interested in the report, not sure whether it still makes sense to contribute. What do you

Hi all I am trying to develop a summary report of the Hackathon. I have just sent an overleaf link to all hackathon participants to kindly update it with a short summary of the tasks completed

Hi all, I was curious about this as well. My understanding was that we have all the "metadata" about the type of the flow objects, the activity types, and so on, so now we just need the python to

Hello hello During the hackathon we talked about aggregators but I have no idea of how they are implemented. For example, Exiobase documents emissions of "HFC"s while we have characterisation factors

Dear all Could you please let me know if we have the Exiobase data (HSUT) in RDF format yet ? We have a request for the data from the computer science dept in AAU, who might be further involved in

Sorry for the delay. 11 responses, see below. Worked well. We should continue doing… • I guess slack was really easy to work with all participants across different channels. I

Interesting, I will have a deeper look when possible. I was updating the group readme. Should I move the references to the Hackathon somewhere else? it seems that this repo will survive and it will

As we are not the only people thinking about these topics, there has already been a lot of work in this area. It is relatively easy to find some half-baked implementations in RDF, e.g.

Hello hello lets see if I am getting this right. Chris, when you say "put metadata systems in their native form into arborist (e.g. ISIC 3, ISIC 4, HS1, NACE, NAICS, CPC)" does that mean "as

In this case your example seems fine, you can still say that fbcl is subclass of POWC probably. you can also say sameAs between POWN and Nuclear, assuming that the only way of producing electricity

Thanks Matteo- It is a bit tricky keeping the class definitions and instances inline with the idea of `rdf:type` referring to multiple classes - could you provide an alternative implementation of the

Hi Chris, have you checked the very useful examples here: https://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/skos-and-owl/master.html In general let's use subsclass of and rdf:type when we know it is a subset or an

@Matteo, Bo, Miguel; please comment and correct! Defining correspondence tables in RDF Based on my reading of https://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/, I created the following: @prefix bont:

I agree with Chris here. First, most classifications contain themselves hierarchies, typically indicated by some code convention, such as ISIC 4 "011" being a subclass of "01" and

Thanks Miguel- It seems clear to me that the first step should be defining the verbs we will use, and the reasons we are using these particular verbs. For example, both OWL and SKOS seem to offer

In the future, should manual string matching be too time-consuming, you may consider to get some help from fuzzy string comparison (https://github.com/seatgeek/fuzzywuzzy) /Romain

Dear all During the Friday meeting we discussed the issue of how to arrive from “raw data” to the data stored in the database. There was some disagreement and I think I did not explain myself

Hi all, unfortunately I will not be able to join the call tomorrow. Here is a quick update on my side: - The ontology is pretty stable since the hackathon, although there are open issues for

Dear all An update on this. Yesterday I created a repo following the python skeleton for the functions that will automate part of the workflow. Its called grafter. I have not had time to work on