Chris, Yes, I agree to coordinate this working group. I will do a turn on this hopefully before you all get started Wednesday morning. I will add a group description to the README and will create a

Massimo: it seems your BEP is not publicly viewable. (i get 404: https://github.com/massimopizzol/enhancements/blob/master/beps/0003-bep-ontology.md ) I will save my not-so-humble-opinions for the

Dear Brandon, Carlos, Massimo, Miguel: I think we have a good foundation on which to make specific technical recommendations during the hackathon. Brandon, would you agree to be the coordinator for

Thanks Michele for assuming editorship! I think that guidelines on using the template should be put in #BEP0002; this discussion should be limited to the template itself, i.e. what sections are

The following #BEP0001 is a discussion on the BEP-0001 BONSAI (BEP) Enhancement Proposal Template. Thanks to the authors for the initiative. To brake the ice, I propose that a default time for

>>> I guess by final proposal you are suggesting the use of BEP for this working group, do I understand right? I’ll try to make a summary of the discussion. In this working group we are discussing

Thanks Bo, this was really helpful for me (and hopefully for others) - it shows the power of what you have developed over the last years, and really helps me understand it on a more fundamental

Dear Chris, Yes, of course in principle you can store the GDP/person of a country over a time interval (e.g. from World Bank) in the database : - Activity: All economic activities (defined as those

Dear all- The hackathon starts in less than two weeks, and in order for it to be successful we will need to be well coordinated. A few working groups have made some real progress, but I don't see any

Sorry if sounded smart or know-all I just wanted to explain to Matteo some of the issues in layman terms. I apologized for my mistake on the negative input straight away so I assume we can make peace

YES PLEASE! There have been lots of interesting suggestions from everyone but I am not sure if this is the best medium to maintain such a discussion I second the the suggestion for a document on

I definetely agree on this. We should probably have a shared notebook for this, I think we will lose track of emails. A document on github and using issues? Some other form of collaborative

I guess I am missing something here - I was imagining a system where GDP, etc. would exactly be raw data inputs, and used to validate/estimate error on how much of the economy/whatever our system is

Just to chip in on the discussion on waste and waste treatment activities: - The problem that a service activity often has the same name as the service that it provides is a well-known problem. It is

Den 2019-03-12 kl. 10.28 skrev Chris Mutel: The three examples of data you mention are not (raw) data inputs, but rather outputs from querying the database, i.e. they can all be calculated from the

Hi, I think that using negative inputs to indicate an outputs is already a complication that may be not clear for many people. I think that Bonsai can be also used by the IO community,

Dear all- I very much appreciate the work and active participation of people in this working group! Unfortunately, I must make your lives a little bit harder :) 1. The final proposal should include

Good point Massimo. In Fact, the output flow of the activity "Waste Incineration" should be "TREATED municipal solid waste" and not "Treatment of municipal solid waste" Michele

Den 2019-03-11 kl. 22.31 skrev Chris Mutel: Not having this concept will mean a loss of information when importing from e.g. EXIObase or ecoinvent. Bo

Chris is right that one can use a negative (= input) reference flow. I just never use this approach and I forgot, my mistake. I don’t see how we can skip the reference flow concept though if we are