|
Re: Meeting #rdf #ontology at 10:00 AM (Zoom connection details attached)
#rdf
#ontology
Please send the minutes of the meeting. Here were important things discussed and decsions taken so we need them for BEP 0003 (and especially to stay up to date)
Thanks
BR
Massimo
Please send the minutes of the meeting. Here were important things discussed and decsions taken so we need them for BEP 0003 (and especially to stay up to date)
Thanks
BR
Massimo
|
By
Massimo Pizzol
·
#133
·
|
|
Re: #reproduciblemodels working group - getting organized
#reproduciblemodels
OK, I added a basic overview to the main README and added you all as contributors to the reproducibility repo. Please commit with wild abandon.
Regarding a call- I am free after 9am US pacific (I
OK, I added a basic overview to the main README and added you all as contributors to the reproducibility repo. Please commit with wild abandon.
Regarding a call- I am free after 9am US pacific (I
|
By
Brandon Kuczenski
·
#132
·
|
|
Re: purl domain for bonsai
#correspondencetables
#ontology
Hi,
I have tried to create a purl domain for BONSAI under https://archive.org/services/purl/ but I persistently get a "server error". I have asked the help mail address indicated (I did that 4 days
Hi,
I have tried to create a purl domain for BONSAI under https://archive.org/services/purl/ but I persistently get a "server error". I have asked the help mail address indicated (I did that 4 days
|
By
Bo Weidema
·
#131
·
|
|
Re: Meeting #rdf #ontology at 10:00 AM (Zoom connection details attached)
#rdf
#ontology
I am teaching at 10:15 so will join for 15 min.☺
BR
Massimo
I am teaching at 10:15 so will join for 15 min.☺
BR
Massimo
|
By
Massimo Pizzol
·
#130
·
|
|
Re: Meeting #rdf #ontology at 10:00 AM (Zoom connection details attached)
#rdf
#ontology
Dear all
Here is the link to join the group meeting for ontology and rdf schema. Those not in the group but just interested in the topic are welcome to join as well
Topic: BONSAI ontology and rdf
Dear all
Here is the link to join the group meeting for ontology and rdf schema. Those not in the group but just interested in the topic are welcome to join as well
Topic: BONSAI ontology and rdf
|
By
Agneta
·
#129
·
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables - what needs to be done?
#correspondencetables
Michele is supposed to get this organized, but I can provide some inputs from my side:
This working group should have multiple outputs which build upon each other.
a. Define a standard for
Michele is supposed to get this organized, but I can provide some inputs from my side:
This working group should have multiple outputs which build upon each other.
a. Define a standard for
|
By
Chris Mutel
·
#128
·
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables - what needs to be done?
#correspondencetables
I think the correspondence tables should just be converted to RDF for entry into the database. In my understanding, there is nothing a correspondence table does that an RDF database does not also
I think the correspondence tables should just be converted to RDF for entry into the database. In my understanding, there is nothing a correspondence table does that an RDF database does not also
|
By
Brandon Kuczenski
·
#127
·
|
|
Re: Competency Questions
#ontology
#rdf
>>> you asked about two different things: 1) carbon dioxide equivalents, which is a generic concept, 2) Global Warming Potentials, which are specific weighting factors for GreenHouseGases under a
>>> you asked about two different things: 1) carbon dioxide equivalents, which is a generic concept, 2) Global Warming Potentials, which are specific weighting factors for GreenHouseGases under a
|
By
Massimo Pizzol
·
#126
·
|
|
Re: Competency Questions
#ontology
#rdf
Den 2019-03-13 kl. 17.07 skrev Massimo Pizzol:
Well, you can aggregate any number of activities (and thus also steps in an impact pathway) and thus obtain the desired
Den 2019-03-13 kl. 17.07 skrev Massimo Pizzol:
Well, you can aggregate any number of activities (and thus also steps in an impact pathway) and thus obtain the desired
|
By
Bo Weidema
·
#125
·
|
|
Re: Competency Questions
#ontology
#rdf
Thanks.
Am I right that your comment is similar what you have replied alreadyhere on GDP? My impression is that like in the GDP discussion you are proposing a breakdown of each modelling step by
Thanks.
Am I right that your comment is similar what you have replied alreadyhere on GDP? My impression is that like in the GDP discussion you are proposing a breakdown of each modelling step by
|
By
Massimo Pizzol
·
#124
·
|
|
#correspondencetables - what needs to be done?
#correspondencetables
Dear all
I think the correspondence tables have not been discussed. What would need to be done to meet the objectives of the hackathon?
best,
Miguel (F. Astudillo)
Dear all
I think the correspondence tables have not been discussed. What would need to be done to meet the objectives of the hackathon?
best,
Miguel (F. Astudillo)
|
By
Miguel Fernández Astudillo
·
#123
·
|
|
Re: Competency Questions
#ontology
#rdf
Den 2019-03-13 kl. 16.28 skrev Massimo Pizzol:
What flows out of the steel production is carbon dioxide. 1 kg of carbon dioxide = 1 kg of carbon dioxide equivalents, so I assume what
Den 2019-03-13 kl. 16.28 skrev Massimo Pizzol:
What flows out of the steel production is carbon dioxide. 1 kg of carbon dioxide = 1 kg of carbon dioxide equivalents, so I assume what
|
By
Bo Weidema
·
#122
·
|
|
Re: Competency Questions
#ontology
#rdf
Everything looks fine to me, I just miss some questions aboutimpacts (and I realize that I am not sure if characterisation factors are included in our schema as properties or how …?). Examples:
Everything looks fine to me, I just miss some questions aboutimpacts (and I realize that I am not sure if characterisation factors are included in our schema as properties or how …?). Examples:
|
By
Massimo Pizzol
·
#121
·
|
|
Meeting
#rdf
#ontology
Hi everyone
We have had a lot of interesting discussions on ontology and rdf this week. It would be great to sum up all the suggestions
We have a meeting scheduled at 10:00 AM tomorrow Thursday 14th
Hi everyone
We have had a lot of interesting discussions on ontology and rdf this week. It would be great to sum up all the suggestions
We have a meeting scheduled at 10:00 AM tomorrow Thursday 14th
|
By
Agneta
·
#120
·
|
|
Re: Competency Questions
#ontology
#rdf
I would like to attack this a bit more systematically:
Querying the core database alone (noting that the core observations/datapoints are “flows”):
(BW_Q1)
I would like to attack this a bit more systematically:
Querying the core database alone (noting that the core observations/datapoints are “flows”):
(BW_Q1)
|
By
Bo Weidema
·
#119
·
|
|
Re: Competency Questions
#ontology
#rdf
Hi Matteo
Good questions!
I would like to add:
(AG_Q1) How are the flow objects quantified/ Which units of measure are used?
(e.g. in monetary units, weight, etc)
(AG_Q2) Does the
Hi Matteo
Good questions!
I would like to add:
(AG_Q1) How are the flow objects quantified/ Which units of measure are used?
(e.g. in monetary units, weight, etc)
(AG_Q2) Does the
|
By
Agneta
·
#118
·
|
|
Competency Questions
#ontology
#rdf
Hi all,
an important initial step to align our intentions and clarify the scope of the ontology and the goals of the database is to identify a set of "Competency Questions".
Those are questions that
Hi all,
an important initial step to align our intentions and clarify the scope of the ontology and the goals of the database is to identify a set of "Competency Questions".
Those are questions that
|
By
Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)
·
#117
·
|
|
Re: #reproduciblemodels working group - getting organized
#reproduciblemodels
Hey-
The agenda was set up before any of the working groups was formed, and
will be substantially revised, based mostly on the the information
supplied by the working group coordinators :) So it
Hey-
The agenda was set up before any of the working groups was formed, and
will be substantially revised, based mostly on the the information
supplied by the working group coordinators :) So it
|
By
Chris Mutel
·
#116
·
|
|
Re: BEP-0001 BONSAI (BEP) Enhancement Proposal Template
#bep0001
The discussion on BEP0001 will continue here, I was not aware that a #BEP0001 already existed under the "MAIN" (where it should be) rather than under the "Hackathon" directory.
Int he future, don't
The discussion on BEP0001 will continue here, I was not aware that a #BEP0001 already existed under the "MAIN" (where it should be) rather than under the "Hackathon" directory.
Int he future, don't
|
By
Michele De Rosa
·
#115
·
|
|
Re: Start of the #ontology sub-group
#ontology
>>>I have started drafting a “PEP 0003 ontology” document t
I moved it here which seems a more appropriate location, sorry for late notice.
Massimo
From: <hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io>
>>>I have started drafting a “PEP 0003 ontology” document t
I moved it here which seems a more appropriate location, sorry for late notice.
Massimo
From: <hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io>
|
By
Massimo Pizzol
·
#114
·
|