This is, of course, correct, though it does help clarify things for me. However, perhaps this needs a different conceptual approach? Perhaps something like a resolved exchange, which has isInputOf

Upss… Sorry, me too, I was convinced it was today. Yesterday by that time I was in front of the computer :/. I will try to catch up with the minutes Miguel (F.A.)

Den 2019-03-18 kl. 23.35 skrev Matteo Lissandrini (AAU): Please see the BONSAI glossary: https://github.com/BONSAMURAIS/bonsai/wiki/Glossary Yes, there are in fact (at least) two different instances

This is a very important question! The following is my opinion, and other might have a different perspective. Questions over what can really substitute for what (e.g. for coal this is sulfur content,

Sorry guys I missed the call yesterday. I totally messed up with the time zone, I thought it was today, stupid mistake. I read the minutes and it’s alright will work on the specific task I have

Hey all, I created a number of issues in the reproducibility repo, and assigned one to each of you. Let's all try and do a turn on our assigned issue by the end of Wednesday. Work can be done directly

Thanks Brandon >>> a flow is not an input or an output- it has to be both. I completely agree, and this is what I was trying to write as well. In my understanding a “flow” object is not an

Dear all, I've collected the discussion and something more re: competency questions in the wiki for the RDF framework repository[1], this will have to be restructured. Please feel free to fix any typo

Massimo, Let me weigh in on the input / output question. In my view, a flow is not an input or an output- it has to be both. It has to be an output from the process that created it and an input from

Two small things. 1. This discussion of Apache Jena might be interesting for some of you: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19419025 2. Thanks Massimo, I think this is a great format and makes it

Dear Ontology/RDF group We have a meeting Friday and I would like to share some points for discussion. I am thinking a lot about our ontology and there are two pressing issues that I hope we

Dear Miguel, These are relevant issues. However, for the time being, we have restricted ourselves to data that relect averages with a duration of minimum 1 year. This is because these

Hey folks, I can probably make 5pm tomorrow (9am tomorrow). 5:30 is also fine but I am sensitive to the hungry kids. I can also do pretty much any time later than 5pm so let me know if something else

For me 5.30 is fine, let's see if Brandon can make it. Best, Miguel

Hi all, Sorry for not participating as much the past few weeks. I'm trying to catch up with what everyone has said so far. In terms of these competency questions. I guess the question that Massimo is

Dear Brandon and Tomas, I am sorry but I have withdrawn from the group to better focus on other issues. Best, SM On 14/03/2019 23:28, Chris Mutel wrote:

5:30 PM is really a bad time for me (“kids are hungry”-time) but go ahead I’ll do my best and if I can’t join then amen☺! Massimo From: <hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io> on behalf

Hi all, It would be best for me next week. Monday, Tuesday... I think we can meet after 5pm CET so that Brandon can join us. So I propose Monday 5:30pm CET Regards Carlos

Next week better for me, Monday Tuesday Wednesday. Doodle perhaps? BR Massimo From: <hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io> on behalf of "miguel.astudillo via Groups.Io" <miguel.astudillo@...> Reply-To:

Dear all I am also available today although from 13pm “GMT-4” (I think 10 am pacific time), although talking today may be a bit of a stretch. Otherwise at any time next week at “CET