I guess I am missing something here - I was imagining a system where GDP, etc. would exactly be raw data inputs, and used to validate/estimate error on how much of the economy/whatever our system is

I definetely agree on this. We should probably have a shared notebook for this, I think we will lose track of emails. A document on github and using issues? Some other form of collaborative

YES PLEASE! There have been lots of interesting suggestions from everyone but I am not sure if this is the best medium to maintain such a discussion I second the the suggestion for a document on

Sorry if sounded smart or know-all I just wanted to explain to Matteo some of the issues in layman terms. I apologized for my mistake on the negative input straight away so I assume we can make peace

Dear all- The hackathon starts in less than two weeks, and in order for it to be successful we will need to be well coordinated. A few working groups have made some real progress, but I don't see any

Dear Chris, Yes, of course in principle you can store the GDP/person of a country over a time interval (e.g. from World Bank) in the database : - Activity: All economic activities (defined as those

Thanks Bo, this was really helpful for me (and hopefully for others) - it shows the power of what you have developed over the last years, and really helps me understand it on a more fundamental

>>> I guess by final proposal you are suggesting the use of BEP for this working group, do I understand right? I’ll try to make a summary of the discussion. In this working group we are discussing

The following #BEP0001 is a discussion on the BEP-0001 BONSAI (BEP) Enhancement Proposal Template. Thanks to the authors for the initiative. To brake the ice, I propose that a default time for

Thanks Michele for assuming editorship! I think that guidelines on using the template should be put in #BEP0002; this discussion should be limited to the template itself, i.e. what sections are

Dear Brandon, Carlos, Massimo, Miguel: I think we have a good foundation on which to make specific technical recommendations during the hackathon. Brandon, would you agree to be the coordinator for

Massimo: it seems your BEP is not publicly viewable. (i get 404: https://github.com/massimopizzol/enhancements/blob/master/beps/0003-bep-ontology.md ) I will save my not-so-humble-opinions for the

Chris, Yes, I agree to coordinate this working group. I will do a turn on this hopefully before you all get started Wednesday morning. I will add a group description to the README and will create a

>>>I have started drafting a “PEP 0003 ontology” document t I moved it here which seems a more appropriate location, sorry for late notice. Massimo From: <hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io>

The discussion on BEP0001 will continue here, I was not aware that a #BEP0001 already existed under the "MAIN" (where it should be) rather than under the "Hackathon" directory. Int he future, don't

Hey- The agenda was set up before any of the working groups was formed, and will be substantially revised, based mostly on the the information supplied by the working group coordinators :) So it

Hi all, an important initial step to align our intentions and clarify the scope of the ontology and the goals of the database is to identify a set of "Competency Questions". Those are questions that

Hi Matteo Good questions! I would like to add: (AG_Q1) How are the flow objects quantified/ Which units of measure are used? (e.g. in monetary units, weight, etc) (AG_Q2) Does the

I would like to attack this a bit more systematically: Querying the core database alone (noting that the core observations/datapoints are “flows”): (BW_Q1)

Hi everyone We have had a lot of interesting discussions on ontology and rdf this week. It would be great to sum up all the suggestions We have a meeting scheduled at 10:00 AM tomorrow Thursday 14th