|
Re: Post-hackathon ontology group
#ontology
#followup
Thanks for taking the initiative. I find google.docs to be appropriate for this kind of work. If you prefer an open tool, a less advanced option is a riseup.pad
I would like to
Thanks for taking the initiative. I find google.docs to be appropriate for this kind of work. If you prefer an open tool, a less advanced option is a riseup.pad
I would like to
|
By
Bo Weidema
·
#233
·
|
|
Post-hackathon ontology group
#ontology
#followup
Hej allihop,
I guess all of us have an outline in mind for the ontology-related paper. Here is what I have in mind; I guess we can build on it, iterate and agree on a suitable structure and
Hej allihop,
I guess all of us have an outline in mind for the ontology-related paper. Here is what I have in mind; I guess we can build on it, iterate and agree on a suitable structure and
|
By
Elias Sebastian Azzi
·
#232
·
|
|
#evaluation
#evaluation
Dear all
Here a simple evaluation form for the Hackathon.
It’s anonymous.
BR
Massimo
Dear all
Here a simple evaluation form for the Hackathon.
It’s anonymous.
BR
Massimo
|
By
Massimo Pizzol
·
#231
·
|
|
Next steps for post-hackathon Bonsai
In the Friday morning meeting, Chris gave his ideas for next steps to capitalise on the outputs and momentum of this week. I took some notes (as shared on Slack) and have improved them a littie for
In the Friday morning meeting, Chris gave his ideas for next steps to capitalise on the outputs and momentum of this week. I took some notes (as shared on Slack) and have improved them a littie for
|
By
Tom
·
#230
·
|
|
Re: Summary of working groups_ 28th March2019
I'm creating the sparql queries for the competency questions and double checking the examples as well as the ontology. I'm also working on a converter using sparql. Not sure if Tomas was able to
I'm creating the sparql queries for the competency questions and double checking the examples as well as the ontology. I'm also working on a converter using sparql. Not sure if Tomas was able to
|
By
mmremolona@...
·
#229
·
|
|
Summary of working groups_ 28th March2019
Hi everyone
As we suspended the meeting this evening, here is a quick overview of what we have been doing in Barcelona. Do feel free to add a summary of what you have been doing.
@Chris Writing codes
Hi everyone
As we suspended the meeting this evening, here is a quick overview of what we have been doing in Barcelona. Do feel free to add a summary of what you have been doing.
@Chris Writing codes
|
By
Agneta
·
#228
·
|
|
Re: Namespaces (URIs)
Prefixes like `act` don't really work, as the expansion is specific to
exiobase; I have been using brdfexat (Bonsai RDF exiobase activity
type), and similar,
Prefixes like `act` don't really work, as the expansion is specific to
exiobase; I have been using brdfexat (Bonsai RDF exiobase activity
type), and similar,
|
By
Chris Mutel
·
#227
·
|
|
Re: Namespaces (URIs)
The README has been updated with the name spaces (and names of graphs) defined within BONSAI
https://github.com/BONSAMURAIS/BONSAI-ontology-RDF-framework/blob/master/README.md
Currently the following
The README has been updated with the name spaces (and names of graphs) defined within BONSAI
https://github.com/BONSAMURAIS/BONSAI-ontology-RDF-framework/blob/master/README.md
Currently the following
|
By
Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)
·
#226
·
|
|
Namespaces (URIs)
Hi everyone
The ontology group understands that most of us are currently busy converting their raw data to rdf format based on the bonsai ontology. We have the following namespaces to refer to the
Hi everyone
The ontology group understands that most of us are currently busy converting their raw data to rdf format based on the bonsai ontology. We have the following namespaces to refer to the
|
By
Agneta
·
#225
·
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables header format
#correspondencetables
Yes, that makes a lot of sense
Yes, that makes a lot of sense
|
By
Miguel Fernández Astudillo
·
#224
·
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables header format
#correspondencetables
Please consider https://frictionlessdata.io/specs/csv-dialect/. We
don't want to invent our own CSV dialect!
--
############################
Chris Mutel
Technology Assessment Group, LEA
Paul
Please consider https://frictionlessdata.io/specs/csv-dialect/. We
don't want to invent our own CSV dialect!
--
############################
Chris Mutel
Technology Assessment Group, LEA
Paul
|
By
Chris Mutel
·
#223
·
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables header format
#correspondencetables
When I tried to create metadata yesterday for one of the tables (isic4 to Nace2 I think) that table was in the format you describe. The problem was that some columns had mixed data types (e.g. strings
When I tried to create metadata yesterday for one of the tables (isic4 to Nace2 I think) that table was in the format you describe. The problem was that some columns had mixed data types (e.g. strings
|
By
Massimo Pizzol
·
#222
·
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables header format
#correspondencetables
Dear all
For consistency I think we should specify a bit more the format of the final tables
Separator: I’d propose “,”
null values: An empty value seems reasonable to me, but I do not
Dear all
For consistency I think we should specify a bit more the format of the final tables
Separator: I’d propose “,”
null values: An empty value seems reasonable to me, but I do not
|
By
Miguel Fernández Astudillo
·
#221
·
|
|
#reproducibility #reproduciblemodels subgroup - on slack
#reproducibility
#reproduciblemodels
Everyone interested in the reproducibility working group, please be advised that all discussion for this will be on the Slack channel:
https://bonsai-open.slack.com/messages/CH663NGPJ
Thanks!
Everyone interested in the reproducibility working group, please be advised that all discussion for this will be on the Slack channel:
https://bonsai-open.slack.com/messages/CH663NGPJ
Thanks!
|
By
Brandon Kuczenski
·
#220
·
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables header format
#correspondencetables
I still do not understand why we do not use RDF for this? In RDF every one of the relations would be separate.
Bo
Den 2019-03-25 kl. 18.03 skrev miguel.astudillo@...:
I still do not understand why we do not use RDF for this? In RDF every one of the relations would be separate.
Bo
Den 2019-03-25 kl. 18.03 skrev miguel.astudillo@...:
|
By
Bo Weidema
·
#219
·
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables header format
#correspondencetables
Agree. Isn t this also the current format of the tables?
Agree. Isn t this also the current format of the tables?
|
By
Michele De Rosa
·
#218
·
|
|
#correspondencetables header format
#correspondencetables
Hello all
should the correspondence table have only two columns?
For example, the exiobase to nace codes: to classify exiobase activities to nace codes the names (descriptions) are not needed. For
Hello all
should the correspondence table have only two columns?
For example, the exiobase to nace codes: to classify exiobase activities to nace codes the names (descriptions) are not needed. For
|
By
Miguel Fernández Astudillo
·
#217
·
|
|
Re: Task in the Ontology development
#ontology
This is something we need to add, see #6
https://github.com/BONSAMURAIS/BONSAI-ontology-RDF-framework/issues/6
I remember I've seen some "equation/functional" relation in the SIO ontology for
This is something we need to add, see #6
https://github.com/BONSAMURAIS/BONSAI-ontology-RDF-framework/issues/6
I remember I've seen some "equation/functional" relation in the SIO ontology for
|
By
Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)
·
#216
·
|
|
Re: Task in the Ontology development
#ontology
Hi all,
Is property relation included in current objectives? I was thinking it could be a flow-object divided by a flow-object but this might be too simplistic as the scaling might not be correct in
Hi all,
Is property relation included in current objectives? I was thinking it could be a flow-object divided by a flow-object but this might be too simplistic as the scaling might not be correct in
|
By
mmremolona@...
·
#215
·
|
|
Task in the Ontology development
#ontology
Hi all,
I've created issues for all the tasks that we have now on github
https://github.com/BONSAMURAIS/BONSAI-ontology-RDF-framework/issues
For each task we can use the issue discussion, comment on
Hi all,
I've created issues for all the tasks that we have now on github
https://github.com/BONSAMURAIS/BONSAI-ontology-RDF-framework/issues
For each task we can use the issue discussion, comment on
|
By
Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)
·
#214
·
|