Thanks for taking the initiative. I find google.docs to be appropriate for this kind of work. If you prefer an open tool, a less advanced option is a riseup.pad I would like to

Hej allihop, I guess all of us have an outline in mind for the ontology-related paper. Here is what I have in mind; I guess we can build on it, iterate and agree on a suitable structure and

Dear all Here a simple evaluation form for the Hackathon. It’s anonymous. BR Massimo

In the Friday morning meeting, Chris gave his ideas for next steps to capitalise on the outputs and momentum of this week. I took some notes (as shared on Slack) and have improved them a littie for

I'm creating the sparql queries for the competency questions and double checking the examples as well as the ontology. I'm also working on a converter using sparql. Not sure if Tomas was able to

Hi everyone As we suspended the meeting this evening, here is a quick overview of what we have been doing in Barcelona. Do feel free to add a summary of what you have been doing. @Chris Writing codes

Prefixes like `act` don't really work, as the expansion is specific to exiobase; I have been using brdfexat (Bonsai RDF exiobase activity type), and similar,

The README has been updated with the name spaces (and names of graphs) defined within BONSAI https://github.com/BONSAMURAIS/BONSAI-ontology-RDF-framework/blob/master/README.md Currently the following

Hi everyone The ontology group understands that most of us are currently busy converting their raw data to rdf format based on the bonsai ontology. We have the following namespaces to refer to the

Yes, that makes a lot of sense

Please consider https://frictionlessdata.io/specs/csv-dialect/. We don't want to invent our own CSV dialect! -- ############################ Chris Mutel Technology Assessment Group, LEA Paul

When I tried to create metadata yesterday for one of the tables (isic4 to Nace2 I think) that table was in the format you describe. The problem was that some columns had mixed data types (e.g. strings

Dear all For consistency I think we should specify a bit more the format of the final tables Separator: I’d propose “,” null values: An empty value seems reasonable to me, but I do not

Everyone interested in the reproducibility working group, please be advised that all discussion for this will be on the Slack channel: https://bonsai-open.slack.com/messages/CH663NGPJ Thanks!

I still do not understand why we do not use RDF for this? In RDF every one of the relations would be separate. Bo Den 2019-03-25 kl. 18.03 skrev miguel.astudillo@...:

Agree. Isn t this also the current format of the tables?

Hello all should the correspondence table have only two columns? For example, the exiobase to nace codes: to classify exiobase activities to nace codes the names (descriptions) are not needed. For

This is something we need to add, see #6 https://github.com/BONSAMURAIS/BONSAI-ontology-RDF-framework/issues/6 I remember I've seen some "equation/functional" relation in the SIO ontology for

Hi all, Is property relation included in current objectives? I was thinking it could be a flow-object divided by a flow-object but this might be too simplistic as the scaling might not be correct in

Hi all, I've created issues for all the tasks that we have now on github https://github.com/BONSAMURAIS/BONSAI-ontology-RDF-framework/issues For each task we can use the issue discussion, comment on