|
Re: #correspondencetables - what needs to be done?
#correspondencetables
We have a good start! I added a checklist for pre-hackathon release, and added that to the hackathon planning board.
Michele, please add a short working group description to the hackathon README.
|
|
|
|
Re: #softwaremethods Python library skeleton
#softwaremethods
Dear Brandon, Stefano, and Tomas:
As I did not see much movement from your working group, I have done the following:
|
|
|
|
Updating the hackathon agenda
Dear all-
It is clear that we need to update the agenda, as we have split into working groups with different competencies, and I expect these groups to stick more or less together in Barcelona. I am therefore asking for your ideas, modifications, and wishes for the hackathon agenda. Let your creativity flow! So far, it seems to me like we will need an intro on Monday morning; and time for zoom conferences to bring in remote collaborators in the morning and late afternoon. These conferences will be a chance for each working group to present their current work for questions and comment, and to set themselves goals for the next 12 hours. Finally, we will have a summing up and strategizing for next steps on Friday afternoon (we will officially end at 14:00 on Friday, though there will be an Apero afterwards).
|
|
|
|
Re: Weekly Q&A with Chris
Dear all-
The call tomorrow is cancelled so that people (including me) can join the climate strike. You are welcome to send any pressing questions to me directly via email.
|
|
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables - what needs to be done?
#correspondencetables
@Chris Done. Is there anyone that subscribed to this group that is not listed as a group member right now? @All, I am working on collecting under our group repo all the info/material/guidelines we have already found/developed on this topic. Get in touch with me if you have material/ideas
|
|
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables - what needs to be done?
#correspondencetables
Working group self-assignment is here:
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
https://bonsai.groups.io/g/hackathon2019/responses?pollid=4642
On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 at 11:20, <michele.derosa@bonsai.uno> wrote:
--
############################ Chris Mutel Technology Assessment Group, LEA Paul Scherrer Institut OHSA D22 5232 Villigen PSI Switzerland http://chris.mutel.org Telefon: +41 56 310 5787 ############################
|
|
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables - what needs to be done?
#correspondencetables
Tiago Morais
Hi Michele,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I selected to work in this group. How can I help now? I am also available to have a call Monday. -- Tiago G. Morais Instituto Superior Técnico - Universidade de Lisboa/University of Lisbon MARETEC/LARSYS Área Científica de Ambiente e Energia/Environment and Energy Scientific Area Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica/Department of Mechanical Engineering Pavilhão de Mecânica I | Av. Rovisco Pais, 1 | 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal Tel: +351 21 841 98 77 | ext. 3877
-----Original Message-----
From: hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io <hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io> On Behalf Of Chris Mutel Sent: 15 de março de 2019 10:27 To: hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io Subject: Re: [hackathon2019] #correspondencetables - what needs to be done? Working group self-assignment is here: https://bonsai.groups.io/g/hackathon2019/responses?pollid=4642 On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 at 11:20, <michele.derosa@bonsai.uno> wrote:
-- ############################ Chris Mutel Technology Assessment Group, LEA Paul Scherrer Institut OHSA D22 5232 Villigen PSI Switzerland http://chris.mutel.org Telefon: +41 56 310 5787 ############################
|
|
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables - what needs to be done?
#correspondencetables
1. See if there are any differences in the elementary flows lists of
exiobase version 2 and 3 (even a single character difference is enough to need a mapping). 2. Map ecoinvent elementary flow list (from https://github.com/BONSAMURAIS/Correspondence-tables/blob/master/EcoinventElflow3.2_to_ILCD.csv) to EXIOBASE elementary flow list 3. Map exiobase v3 elementary flow list to US EPA elementary flow list (https://github.com/USEPA/Federal-LCA-Commons-Elementary-Flow-List/blob/master/fedelemflowlist/output/FedElemFlowList_0.2.csv) On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 at 11:35, Tiago Morais <tiago.g.morais@tecnico.ulisboa.pt> wrote:
-- ############################ Chris Mutel Technology Assessment Group, LEA Paul Scherrer Institut OHSA D22 5232 Villigen PSI Switzerland http://chris.mutel.org Telefon: +41 56 310 5787 ############################
|
|
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables - what needs to be done?
#correspondencetables
Tiago Morais
I will start working on the point 1.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
-- Tiago G. Morais Instituto Superior Técnico - Universidade de Lisboa/University of Lisbon MARETEC/LARSYS Área Científica de Ambiente e Energia/Environment and Energy Scientific Area Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica/Department of Mechanical Engineering Pavilhão de Mecânica I | Av. Rovisco Pais, 1 | 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal Tel: +351 21 841 98 77 | ext. 3877
-----Original Message-----
From: hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io <hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io> On Behalf Of Chris Mutel Sent: 15 de março de 2019 10:44 To: hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io Subject: Re: [hackathon2019] #correspondencetables - what needs to be done? 1. See if there are any differences in the elementary flows lists of exiobase version 2 and 3 (even a single character difference is enough to need a mapping). 2. Map ecoinvent elementary flow list (from https://github.com/BONSAMURAIS/Correspondence-tables/blob/master/EcoinventElflow3.2_to_ILCD.csv) to EXIOBASE elementary flow list 3. Map exiobase v3 elementary flow list to US EPA elementary flow list (https://github.com/USEPA/Federal-LCA-Commons-Elementary-Flow-List/blob/master/fedelemflowlist/output/FedElemFlowList_0.2.csv) On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 at 11:35, Tiago Morais <tiago.g.morais@tecnico.ulisboa.pt> wrote:
-- ############################ Chris Mutel Technology Assessment Group, LEA Paul Scherrer Institut OHSA D22 5232 Villigen PSI Switzerland http://chris.mutel.org Telefon: +41 56 310 5787 ############################
|
|
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables - what needs to be done?
#correspondencetables
arthur.jakobs@...
Hi Michele,
Like Tiago, I also opted for this group to offer my help. I added my name to the readme on github and created a pull request. I will start to work on point 2 from Chris' list.
|
|
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables - what needs to be done?
#correspondencetables
Tiago Morais
Hi all,
I already finished the correspondence between v3 and v2 of exiobase, but I’m not authorize to upload in the github. Thus, I attached the file year.
Meanwhile, I will also start to work on the point 3 from Chris’s list.
|
|
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables - what needs to be done?
#correspondencetables
Great! What's your GitHub usr? I'll add you. Please update the overview file too (see readme in repo)
|
|
|
|
Re: #correspondencetables - what needs to be done?
#correspondencetables
Tiago Morais
It is tgmorais1.
Ok ok!
|
|
|
|
Re: #reproduciblemodels working group - getting organized
#reproduciblemodels
Miguel Fernández Astudillo
Dear all
I am also available today although from 13pm “GMT-4” (I think 10 am pacific time), although talking today may be a bit of a stretch.
Otherwise at any time next week at “CET times” (not before 8am CET please !)
Best
Miguel F. Ast.
From: hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io <hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io> On Behalf Of Brandon Kuczenski
OK, I added a basic overview to the main README and added you all as contributors to the reproducibility repo. Please commit with wild abandon.
|
|
|
|
Re: #reproduciblemodels working group - getting organized
#reproduciblemodels
Massimo Pizzol
Next week better for me, Monday Tuesday Wednesday. Doodle perhaps? BR
From: <hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io> on behalf of "miguel.astudillo via Groups.Io" <miguel.astudillo@...>
Dear all
I am also available today although from 13pm “GMT-4” (I think 10 am pacific time), although talking today may be a bit of a stretch.
Otherwise at any time next week at “CET times” (not before 8am CET please !)
Best
Miguel F. Ast.
From: hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io <hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io>
On Behalf Of Brandon Kuczenski
Sent: 14 March 2019 06:09 To: hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io Subject: Re: [hackathon2019] #reproduciblemodels working group - getting organized
OK, I added a basic overview to the main README and added you all as contributors to the
reproducibility repo. Please commit with wild abandon.
|
|
|
|
Re: #reproduciblemodels working group - getting organized
#reproduciblemodels
Carlos David Gaete <cdgaete@...>
Hi all, It would be best for me next week. Monday, Tuesday... I think we can meet after 5pm CET so that Brandon can join us. So I propose Monday 5:30pm CET Regards Carlos
|
|
|
|
Re: #reproduciblemodels working group - getting organized
#reproduciblemodels
Massimo Pizzol
5:30 PM is really a bad time for me (“kids are hungry”-time) but go ahead I’ll do my best and if I can’t join then amen ☺!
Massimo
From: <hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io> on behalf of "Carlos David Gaete via Groups.Io" <cdgaete@...>
Hi all,
It would be best for me next week. Monday, Tuesday... I think we can meet after 5pm CET so that Brandon can join us. So I propose Monday 5:30pm CET Regards Carlos
|
|
|
|
Re: #softwaremethods Python library skeleton
#softwaremethods
Stefano Merciai
Dear Brandon and Tomas, I am sorry but I have withdrawn from the group to better focus on other issues. Best, SM On 14/03/2019 23:28, Chris Mutel wrote:
Dear Brandon, Stefano, and Tomas: -- Best, S.
|
|
|
|
mmremolona@...
Hi all,
Sorry for not participating as much the past few weeks. I'm trying to catch up with what everyone has said so far. In terms of these competency questions. I guess the question that Massimo is asking is with respect to time scales and time windows. I'm not entirely familiar with the dataset that is available in the domain, but these time scales for measurements can cause some incongruity in the representation that is finally done in the ontologies. I'm not sure if the questions I ask are of the type to be included in these competency questions but my opinions are as follows: (MR_Q1) What is the time granularity of the data that we acquire? This includes flow rates and production statistics. I also assume this varies with the different sources of data. Some data may already be averaged (Do we handle these differently?). (MR_Q2) Are we going to aggregate data as part of the ontology specification or is this left for other parts of the pipeline? And if we are to aggregate data, to what degree and time scales? (per hour, per day, per week - I think this depends on how often we aggregate data and what data is available, I don't think a per minute data is significant enough in the overall scheme of LCA but I might be wrong) As of now, these are the questions that came to my head as I'm reading along the threads in this group. I'll post more ideas as I come across them. Best, Miguel Remolona
|
|
|
|
Re: #reproduciblemodels working group - getting organized
#reproduciblemodels
Miguel Fernández Astudillo
For me 5.30 is fine, let's see if Brandon can make it.
Best, Miguel
From: hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io <hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io> On Behalf Of Massimo Pizzol
Sent: 15 March 2019 15:37 To: hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io Subject: Re: [hackathon2019] #reproduciblemodels working group - getting organized
5:30 PM is really a bad time for me (“kids are hungry”-time) but go ahead I’ll do my best and if I can’t join then amen ☺!
Massimo
From: <hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io> on behalf of "Carlos David Gaete via Groups.Io" <cdgaete@...>
Hi all,
It would be best for me next week. Monday, Tuesday... I think we can meet after 5pm CET so that Brandon can join us. So I propose Monday 5:30pm CET Regards Carlos
|
|
|
