Hi everyone Please find the meeting minutes in the attached document. A follow- up meeting is planned on Friday 22nd March, 9:00 AM

#rdf #ontology

I would suggest taking the US EPA flow list as the basis for the BONSAI flow list - they have put in quite a lot of work in basing their names and metadata on accepted standards and ontologies. https:

#ontology

This message is for those who signed up for the ontology sub-group (Current members: Bo, Elias, Massimo); if this isn't you, you can mute the #ontology hashtag. Based on the description by Chris and M

#ontology

Hi Thanks for this message Bo. Actually I am currently working on points 3a and 3b,- Using existing LCA ontology ( based on BONSAI wiki and Kuczenski et al (2016)) as a starting point to develop an RD

#ontology

Dear Chris, Thanks for this suggestion. This topic is also relevant for the "Correspondence files" group. In the end, it is not so important which list we choose initially, because any list will devel

#ontology

Dear Agneta, Yes, I think a joint meeting Friday would be good to clarify the boundary between the tasks of the two groups. Bo Den 2019-03-05 kl. 13.12 skrev Agneta: --

#ontology

Thanks for this reminder that there is a lot of deep knowledge already in the wiki. However, in this specific case, I think we have an alternative to building our own thing, as the US EPA is a) open t

#ontology

Dear Chris, I would agree when we are talking about really general issues such as time and geography, but for the truly core dimensions of the Industrial Ecology framework (activities and flow-objects

#ontology

>>>I have started drafting a “PEP 0003 ontology” document t I moved it here which seems a more appropriate location, sorry for late notice. Massimo From: <hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io> on behalf of

#ontology

3) Decide on namespacing for the part of the ontology that is BONSAI-specific (i.e., which does not reside elsewhere): Suggestion to use purl.org - or bonsai.org - any other suggestions or arguments f

#ontology

Sorry; I missed it. I had two concurrent meeting this morning.

#ontology

Thanks Matteo for bringing the discussion to the platform. My questions in relation to the schema and our discussions on friday are: 1. I personally find the terms ‘Flow’ and ‘Flow object’ interchange

#ontology

Hi Matteo Good questions! I would like to add: (AG_Q1) How are the flow objects quantified/ Which units of measure are used? (e.g. in monetary units, weight, etc) (AG_Q2) Does the input and output of

#ontology #rdf

Den 2019-03-07 kl. 02.19 skrev Elias Sebastian Azzi: Makes sense. I will create an account. I think the definitions of "activities" and "flow-objects" are broad enough to cover both economy and enviro

#ontology

Hi all, I've created issues for all the tasks that we have now on github https://github.com/BONSAMURAIS/BONSAI-ontology-RDF-framework/issues For each task we can use the issue discussion, comment on i

#ontology

Hi all, Is property relation included in current objectives? I was thinking it could be a flow-object divided by a flow-object but this might be too simplistic as the scaling might not be correct in t

#ontology

This is something we need to add, see #6 https://github.com/BONSAMURAIS/BONSAI-ontology-RDF-framework/issues/6 I remember I've seen some "equation/functional" relation in the SIO ontology for instance

#ontology

Hello, Thanks for your input. * You should have received an invitation, Google Drive file. Overleaf is interesting indeed; if a majority wants it, we can switch. * Web Conference and paper format: to

#ontology #followup

About why do we separate between two subclass "input" and "output", here is my reasoning. On the one hand this is at the ontology level to restrict the domain of the input and output relationships. As

#ontology

Updated version of “PEP 0003 ontology” document here, revised after our meeting on Friday and discussions during the week. I didn’t have much time to do this so I hope to have captured the main issues

#ontology