|
Competency Questions
#ontology
#rdf
This is, of course, correct, though it does help clarify things for me. However, perhaps this needs a different conceptual approach? Perhaps something like a resolved exchange, which has isInputOf *an
This is, of course, correct, though it does help clarify things for me. However, perhaps this needs a different conceptual approach? Perhaps something like a resolved exchange, which has isInputOf *an
|
By
Chris Mutel
· #173
·
|
|
Competency Questions
#ontology
#rdf
Thanks Bo for the clarification I've seen this, my concern is that the EXIOBASE data does not contain any explicit information about this, right? So this information should come from somewhere else(?)
Thanks Bo for the clarification I've seen this, my concern is that the EXIOBASE data does not contain any explicit information about this, right? So this information should come from somewhere else(?)
|
By
Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)
· #177
·
|
|
Start of the #ontology sub-group
#ontology
Hello, Finally have time for some inputs to your extensive discussions and nice summaries. ALPHA/ Arguments to NOT introduce subclasses like “product”, “emission”, and “waste”. I add to the list of ar
Hello, Finally have time for some inputs to your extensive discussions and nice summaries. ALPHA/ Arguments to NOT introduce subclasses like “product”, “emission”, and “waste”. I add to the list of ar
|
By
Elias Sebastian Azzi
· #178
·
Edited
|
|
Start of the #ontology sub-group
#ontology
Thanks Elias for the interesting reflections. I believe all your points are related. My impression is that we are converging towards an ontology that is operational with a minimal number of elements a
Thanks Elias for the interesting reflections. I believe all your points are related. My impression is that we are converging towards an ontology that is operational with a minimal number of elements a
|
By
Massimo Pizzol
· #182
·
|
|
Start of the #ontology sub-group
#ontology
This is a great comment, and is to me a perfect example of how people's experience leads them to accept restraints without even realizing it. 1. Mathematically, we don't need to distinguish between te
This is a great comment, and is to me a perfect example of how people's experience leads them to accept restraints without even realizing it. 1. Mathematically, we don't need to distinguish between te
|
By
Chris Mutel
· #187
·
|
|
Start of the #ontology sub-group
#ontology
Ok thanks so this is the solution I was asking for. We can separate between technosphere and rest by using an external list of names. And yes you are right about the matrix operation it will work even
Ok thanks so this is the solution I was asking for. We can separate between technosphere and rest by using an external list of names. And yes you are right about the matrix operation it will work even
|
By
Massimo Pizzol
· #188
·
|
|
Start of the #ontology sub-group
#ontology
Hi, Thank you for the nice exchange of ideas. I just want to add some little inputs. How do we distinguish between CO2 emitted from the chimney and the CO2 used for soft drinks? Then I think that the
Hi, Thank you for the nice exchange of ideas. I just want to add some little inputs. How do we distinguish between CO2 emitted from the chimney and the CO2 used for soft drinks? Then I think that the
|
By
Stefano Merciai
· #189
·
|
|
Start of the #ontology sub-group
#ontology
Hi Elias (and others) Just a few comments on some of the points you have mentioned: >>Use of subclasses for input and output VS Use of predicates isInputOf and isOutputOf I am aware that this question
Hi Elias (and others) Just a few comments on some of the points you have mentioned: >>Use of subclasses for input and output VS Use of predicates isInputOf and isOutputOf I am aware that this question
|
By
Agneta
· #190
·
|
|
Meeting #rdf #ontology Zoom meeting details
#rdf
#ontology
Hi everyone There are lots of interesting discussions coming up and we are looking forward to finalizing an ontology for the hackathon All group members and interested parties are invited to join the
Hi everyone There are lots of interesting discussions coming up and we are looking forward to finalizing an ontology for the hackathon All group members and interested parties are invited to join the
|
By
Agneta
· #191
·
|
|
Start of the #ontology sub-group
#ontology
>>>2. We don't need the concept of a reference flow to make a technosphere matrix, But we need that to make a square matrix. The question is whether it needs to be specified in the ontology or can be
>>>2. We don't need the concept of a reference flow to make a technosphere matrix, But we need that to make a square matrix. The question is whether it needs to be specified in the ontology or can be
|
By
Massimo Pizzol
· #192
·
|
|
Start of the #ontology sub-group
#ontology
I think that a square matrix can just be done by aggregation. Best, Stefano
I think that a square matrix can just be done by aggregation. Best, Stefano
|
By
Stefano Merciai
· #193
·
|
|
Determining Flow = Reference Flow
#ontology
#rdfframework
Hi, The purpose of the determining flow is to be able to distinguish 1) the flow that makes an activity occur 2) the flows that occurs as a consequence of the activity occurring. It will allow us to d
Hi, The purpose of the determining flow is to be able to distinguish 1) the flow that makes an activity occur 2) the flows that occurs as a consequence of the activity occurring. It will allow us to d
|
By
Bo Weidema
· #194
·
|
|
Start of the #ontology sub-group
#ontology
Den 2019-03-20 kl. 16.14 skrev Stefano Merciai: In the wiki, we have about the observation (datapoint): Number: Floating point numbers xsd:float. (...) Note also that ecoSpold2 has the option of provi
Den 2019-03-20 kl. 16.14 skrev Stefano Merciai: In the wiki, we have about the observation (datapoint): Number: Floating point numbers xsd:float. (...) Note also that ecoSpold2 has the option of provi
|
By
Bo Weidema
· #195
·
|
|
Post-hackathon ontology group
#ontology
#followup
I totally feel the same. I always publish pre-prints on my personal page (not arxiv, I have issues with the use of arxiv nowadays) and usually the confs/journal I submit to have open proceedings. Chee
I totally feel the same. I always publish pre-prints on my personal page (not arxiv, I have issues with the use of arxiv nowadays) and usually the confs/journal I submit to have open proceedings. Chee
|
By
Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)
· #241
·
|
|
Start of the #ontology sub-group
#ontology
Within yesterday’s correspondence on biosphere flows and reference flows Agneta wrote that: >> [for doing LCA…] we can develop a secondary ontology which continues to use BONSAI as the primary ontolog
Within yesterday’s correspondence on biosphere flows and reference flows Agneta wrote that: >> [for doing LCA…] we can develop a secondary ontology which continues to use BONSAI as the primary ontolog
|
By
Massimo Pizzol
· #199
·
|
|
Start of the #ontology sub-group
#ontology
We will be able to talk about this soon in person, which should be helpful as we might be going a bit in circles. In any case, here are my contributions to the dance: 1. Identifying potential biospher
We will be able to talk about this soon in person, which should be helpful as we might be going a bit in circles. In any case, here are my contributions to the dance: 1. Identifying potential biospher
|
By
Chris Mutel
· #201
·
|
|
Start of the #ontology sub-group
#ontology
>>> as we might be going a bit in circles Thanks. I think we agree on all points. You confirm that we are going for a general solution and that if I want to upgrade to a specific solution (one that lo
>>> as we might be going a bit in circles Thanks. I think we agree on all points. You confirm that we are going for a general solution and that if I want to upgrade to a specific solution (one that lo
|
By
Massimo Pizzol
· #202
·
|
|
Examples of property-references
#ontology
#rdfframework
General format in everyday language: Flow F is given in proportion to X amount of [Time OR Flow G] of activity A (this last information may be omitted if we require that Flow F and G are always from t
General format in everyday language: Flow F is given in proportion to X amount of [Time OR Flow G] of activity A (this last information may be omitted if we require that Flow F and G are always from t
|
By
Bo Weidema
· #206
·
|
|
How does the ontology group support the correspondence table group
#rdf
#correspondencetables
#ontology
I am not very clear on how we could support each other. Perhaps you can provide a clearer description What I understand is the correspondence table ( currently in xls format) should be converted into
I am not very clear on how we could support each other. Perhaps you can provide a clearer description What I understand is the correspondence table ( currently in xls format) should be converted into
|
By
Agneta
· #210
·
|
|
Post-hackathon ontology group
#ontology
#followup
Sorry to post something somewhat off-topic, but this statement is not correct - peer-reviewed publications can absolutely be developed in the open, and even some vintage pay-for-access journals such a
Sorry to post something somewhat off-topic, but this statement is not correct - peer-reviewed publications can absolutely be developed in the open, and even some vintage pay-for-access journals such a
|
By
Chris Mutel
· #239
·
|