Hi all, I was curious about this as well. My understanding was that we have all the "metadata" about the type of the flow objects, the activity types, and so on, so now we just need the python to extr

#rdfconversion #rdf #exiobase

Hello hello During the hackathon we talked about aggregators but I have no idea of how they are implemented. For example, Exiobase documents emissions of "HFC"s while we have characterisation factors

#rdf #correspondencetables #ontology

Dear all Could you please let me know if we have the Exiobase data (HSUT) in RDF format yet ? We have a request for the data from the computer science dept in AAU, who might be further involved in the

#rdfconversion #rdf #exiobase

Hi all, unfortunately I will not be able to join the call tomorrow. Here is a quick update on my side: - The ontology is pretty stable since the hackathon, although there are open issues for improveme

#rdf #rdfframework #followup #ontology

We have lists of activities and flows in different classifications. - Each classification has its URI / is a super-class for all its elements? - Each activity or flow has its URI and a property saying

#rdf #correspondencetables #ontology

I am not very clear on how we could support each other. Perhaps you can provide a clearer description What I understand is the correspondence table ( currently in xls format) should be converted into

#rdf #correspondencetables #ontology

Hi everyone There are lots of interesting discussions coming up and we are looking forward to finalizing an ontology for the hackathon All group members and interested parties are invited to join the

#rdf #ontology

Thanks Bo for the clarification I've seen this, my concern is that the EXIOBASE data does not contain any explicit information about this, right? So this information should come from somewhere else(?)

#ontology #rdf

This is, of course, correct, though it does help clarify things for me. However, perhaps this needs a different conceptual approach? Perhaps something like a resolved exchange, which has isInputOf *an

#ontology #rdf

Den 2019-03-18 kl. 23.35 skrev Matteo Lissandrini (AAU): Please see the BONSAI glossary: https://github.com/BONSAMURAIS/bonsai/wiki/Glossary Yes, there are in fact (at least) two different instances o

#ontology #rdf

This is a very important question! The following is my opinion, and other might have a different perspective. Questions over what can really substitute for what (e.g. for coal this is sulfur content,

#ontology #rdf

Dear all, I've collected the discussion and something more re: competency questions in the wiki for the RDF framework repository[1], this will have to be restructured. Please feel free to fix any typo

#ontology #rdf

Dear Miguel, These are relevant issues. However, for the time being, we have restricted ourselves to data that relect averages with a duration of minimum 1 year. This is because these are the typical

#ontology #rdf

Hi all, Sorry for not participating as much the past few weeks. I'm trying to catch up with what everyone has said so far. In terms of these competency questions. I guess the question that Massimo is

#ontology #rdf

I agree with Massimo; let me add a few thoughts. 1. There is no perfect schema, or at least we won't find one in the next weeks. So I think at some point it is better to have something with holes than

#rdf #ontology

Great minutes, thanks for sending them and I look really much forward to next meeting. I’ll try to answer the question below: >>>GitHub repos- BEP 0003 and Deliverables: If we plan to have two differe

#rdf #ontology

Hi everyone Please find the meeting minutes in the attached document. A follow- up meeting is planned on Friday 22nd March, 9:00 AM

#rdf #ontology

Please send the minutes of the meeting. Here were important things discussed and decsions taken so we need them for BEP 0003 (and especially to stay up to date) Thanks BR Massimo

#rdf #ontology

I am teaching at 10:15 so will join for 15 min. ☺ BR Massimo

#rdf #ontology

Dear all Here is the link to join the group meeting for ontology and rdf schema. Those not in the group but just interested in the topic are welcome to join as well Topic: BONSAI ontology and rdf grou

#rdf #ontology