Sorry for the delay. 11 responses, see below. Worked well. We should continue doing… • I guess slack was really easy to work with all participants across different channels. I wonder if this will rema

#evaluation

Just a reminder about filling the evaluation form. Only 5 responded so far. I guess everybody is taking a breath after the full-immersion of the hackathon…but evaluation is important to improve the pr

#evaluation

Thanks Chris I don’t have any problem in publishing a preprint on archiv.org or similar open for comments, and prior to submission to a journal. But until this preprint is ready I am not comfortable i

#ontology #followup

Thanks Elias Good outline. I would prefer using Goole docs for a draft. if this is to become a sci paper it can't be a public document but it should be accessible to contributors only and via invitati

#ontology #followup

Dear all Here a simple evaluation form for the Hackathon. It’s anonymous. BR Massimo

#evaluation

When I tried to create metadata yesterday for one of the tables (isic4 to Nace2 I think) that table was in the format you describe. The problem was that some columns had mixed data types (e.g. strings

#correspondencetables

Updated version of “PEP 0003 ontology” document here, revised after our meeting on Friday and discussions during the week. I didn’t have much time to do this so I hope to have captured the main issues

#ontology

>>> as we might be going a bit in circles Thanks. I think we agree on all points. You confirm that we are going for a general solution and that if I want to upgrade to a specific solution (one that lo

#ontology

Within yesterday’s correspondence on biosphere flows and reference flows Agneta wrote that: >> [for doing LCA…] we can develop a secondary ontology which continues to use BONSAI as the primary ontolog

#ontology

>>>2. We don't need the concept of a reference flow to make a technosphere matrix, But we need that to make a square matrix. The question is whether it needs to be specified in the ontology or can be

#ontology

Ok thanks so this is the solution I was asking for. We can separate between technosphere and rest by using an external list of names. And yes you are right about the matrix operation it will work even

#ontology

Thanks Elias for the interesting reflections. I believe all your points are related. My impression is that we are converging towards an ontology that is operational with a minimal number of elements a

#ontology

Sorry guys I missed the call yesterday. I totally messed up with the time zone, I thought it was today, stupid mistake. I read the minutes and it’s alright will work on the specific task I have been a

#reproduciblemodels

Thanks Brandon >>> a flow is not an input or an output- it has to be both. I completely agree, and this is what I was trying to write as well. In my understanding a “flow” object is not an input or ou

#ontology

Dear Ontology/RDF group We have a meeting Friday and I would like to share some points for discussion. I am thinking a lot about our ontology and there are two pressing issues that I hope we can clari

#ontology

5:30 PM is really a bad time for me (“kids are hungry”-time) but go ahead I’ll do my best and if I can’t join then amen ☺! Massimo From: <hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io> on behalf of "Carlos David Gae

#reproduciblemodels

Next week better for me, Monday Tuesday Wednesday. Doodle perhaps? BR Massimo From: <hackathon2019@bonsai.groups.io> on behalf of "miguel.astudillo via Groups.Io" <miguel.astudillo=lca-net.com@groups.

#reproduciblemodels

Great minutes, thanks for sending them and I look really much forward to next meeting. I’ll try to answer the question below: >>>GitHub repos- BEP 0003 and Deliverables: If we plan to have two differe

#rdf #ontology

Please send the minutes of the meeting. Here were important things discussed and decsions taken so we need them for BEP 0003 (and especially to stay up to date) Thanks BR Massimo

#rdf #ontology

I am teaching at 10:15 so will join for 15 min. ☺ BR Massimo

#rdf #ontology