Dear all, I have received an update form the UNSD Statistical Classification office. This was the source of most of the tables that we currently have on GitHub. These were then removed from UNSD webpa

#correspondencetables

Agree. Isn t this also the current format of the tables?

#correspondencetables

Thanks a lot guys for your contribution so far! This is great! A few comments and answers to the questions above: @ALL (IMPORTANT): Please remember to update the file _Overview_of_available_correspond

#correspondencetables

Great! What's your GitHub usr? I'll add you. Please update the overview file too (see readme in repo)

#correspondencetables

@Chris Done. Is there anyone that subscribed to this group that is not listed as a group member right now? @All, I am working on collecting under our group repo all the info/material/guidelines we hav

#correspondencetables

Thank you Miguel for starting this hashtag and thanks Chris and Brandon for the inputs. This discussion seems the right place to kick start the Group on Correspondence tables. I have just created a ne

#correspondencetables

The discussion on BEP0001 will continue here, I was not aware that a #BEP0001 already existed under the "MAIN" (where it should be) rather than under the "Hackathon" directory. Int he future, don't do

#bep0001

The following #BEP0001 is a discussion on the BEP-0001 BONSAI (BEP) Enhancement Proposal Template. Thanks to the authors for the initiative. To brake the ice, I propose that a default time for discuss

#bep0001

Good point Massimo. In Fact, the output flow of the activity "Waste Incineration" should be "TREATED municipal solid waste" and not "Treatment of municipal solid waste" Michele

#ontology

On the topic bu also as a general comment - I would suggest to distinguish them not only to make clear that the "Carbon dioxide" is an emission (in the example made) but also to make more intuitive fo

#ontology