Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)
Thanks Bo, Miguel,
do you think you can help me materialize this high-level correspondence table then?
Also, this is for activity or flow objects? We would need both..
Department of Computer Science
From: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org> on behalf of miguel.astudillo via Groups.Io <miguel.astudillo@...>
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 2:06:10 PM
Subject: Re: [bonsai] Categories for Exiobase Activities and Flow Objects to enable Exploration #ontology #toolbox
This is an open issue https://github.com/BONSAMURAIS/Correspondence-tables/issues/10
The correspondence between exiobase activities and isic “codes” does not exist. It is not trivial problem because some activities correspond to different “hierarchival levels”. Some are quite broad, others are more specific.
For this very broad classification, the easiest would be to use the highest level of aggregation (isic sections).
From: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Behalf Of Bo Weidema
He, he, ideally they would be in our correspondence table collection...
Den 2019-10-30 kl. 12.10 skrev Matteo Lissandrini (AAU):