toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
CPC product classification is here: http://www.statistics.gov.rw/publication/customized-central-product-classification-cpc
although I am unsure if it is a Rwandan customization?
give it a go for the isic section, that should be straight
forward. I have many nace rev 2 activities “mapped” to
exiobase activity names, reverse it to get the section
should be easy.
are a different kettle of fish, I have not yet worked with
I am currently on sick-leave but I can send you tables we
used during the compilation on Friday/start next week.
October 2019 14:39:24 CET, "Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)"
think you can help me materialize this high-level
correspondence table then?
is for activity or flow objects? We would need
is an open issue https://github.com/BONSAMURAIS/Correspondence-tables/issues/10
correspondence between exiobase activities and isic
“codes” does not exist. It is not trivial problem
because some activities correspond to different
“hierarchival levels”. Some are quite broad, others
are more specific.
this very broad classification, the easiest would be
to use the highest level of aggregation (isic
He, he, ideally they would be in our correspondence
But here: https://sdmx.org/wp-content/uploads/CL_ACTIVITY_ISIC4_1.0.xls
Den 2019-10-30 kl. 12.10 skrev
Matteo Lissandrini (AAU):
That would be
where do I find
Would it not be smartest to use the top
categories from one of the classifications, such
Den 2019-10-30 kl. 11.23
skrev Matteo Lissandrini (AAU):
Sorry, now is
open to anyone for comment,
let me know
your email for edit acces.
Could you please provide
access to the document?