|
Miguel Fernández Astudillo
True, I did the correspondence to the label not the code. Currently it looks like this:
https://github.com/BONSAMURAIS/rdf/blob/master/activitytype/exiobase3_3_17/exiobase3_3_17.ttl
brdfat:A_ALUM a bont:ActivityType rdfs:label "Aluminium production"
the correspondence between the code and the label is in an excel file in native format as extracted from Exiobase official version.
https://github.com/BONSAMURAIS/arborist/tree/master/arborist/data
for the final correspondence table we’d need the uris for the nace2 division… I think there is not a defined ontology for that and we may need to create our own.
Miguel
From: main@bonsai.groups.io <main@bonsai.groups.io> On Behalf Of Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)
Sent: 05 November 2019 16:22 To: main@bonsai.groups.io Subject: Re: [bonsai] Categories for Exiobase Activities and Flow Objects to enable Exploration #ontology #toolbox
Thanks Miguel,
I will work on the activity one for now then.
In the current one I see tare only strings, isn't there a "code" for these ? Like for activities we have the Exiobase code right?
--- From: main@bonsai.groups.io <main@bonsai.groups.io> on behalf of miguel.astudillo via Groups.Io <miguel.astudillo@...>
Hi Matteo
I think that would be the different sections of the CPC (central product classification). Classifing by “sections” is quite crude but relatively easy.
I think (well, rather hope) there is a 1-1 correspondence with nace 2 / isic sections.
For example :
CPC section 0 : “agriculture, forestry and fishery products” corresponds to the activity “agriculture, forestry and fishing”
We have not done that correspondence yet.
Miguel
From: main@bonsai.groups.io <main@bonsai.groups.io> On Behalf Of Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)
Thanks Miguel, this is great.
I don't remember, what do we need for the FlowObject instead?
--- From: main@bonsai.groups.io <main@bonsai.groups.io> on behalf of miguel.astudillo via Groups.Io <miguel.astudillo@...>
Hi
|
|
|
