toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
To re-iterate: Flow is a verb, and should remain as the central
term for our observations.
There seems to be a tendency towards preferring flow-item
(instead of flow-object).
If we cannot settle this now, then add it as an issue with the
arguments given in this thread.
Den 2019-04-03 kl. 13.57 skrev Agneta:
My suggestions are similar to what is given in
Just to reiterate I suggest to change:
Flow object (abstract ) to Flow (a thing that exists)
Flow (specific) to Exchange (a relationship between an
activity and flow (object))
Because we dont have any compartments we dont necessarily
make additional confusions as the ILCD. Moreover, I think
these terms are frequently used by practitioners and hence
easy to understand (the terms were also introduced in
previous LCA ontology papers). Introducing new terms can
just add confusion (IMO)
Alternatively I suggest we just go ahead with the current
terminology and open the case for a public review.
Agneta Ghose, PhD
Post doc, The Danish Centre for Environmental
93 56 2051