I second this comment too. Focus on integration, good documentation, create a critical mass and then facilitating contributions. I would add that for me the challenging aspects in previous

Hi Benjamin and Miguel We already have two datasets one from IO (supply and use tables) and another from MFA linked to the BONSAI ontology. We are in the process of documenting it. I do think some

That would be tremendously helpful for me. To be honest, when discovering new software packages I usually look at the examples, not the documentation. But maybe that's just me! Interesting idea! Count

Hi I will try to elaborate more later but being essentially avolunteer-based organization, I think we also need to pay some attention to thevolunteers. In my opinion many are overwhelmed by the

Hi all, I agree that the USEPA work under Wes has been really impressive and broad. Compared to BONSAI though, it is both very well capitalized and very constrained institutionally. They are (I think)

I echo Matteo's comment :-) Bo Den 2020/06/23 kl. 17.40 skrev Matteo Lissandrini (AAU):

My comment is the following: The real value proposition that none of the existing resources seems to have is the possibility to *integrate* multiple data sources. *Integrate* is complementary but

My thoughts: - BONSAI and other projects (Electricity LCI, US EEIO LCIA base data, LCIA data formats, CDLCI project, GLAD, IEDC,...): I agree that it is hard to keep up with the numerous projects out

+1 to waiting for consensus and tooling to make this trivial on existing repos. I will make a proposal to switch to main as the default branch name to the GA, and post an update when a decision is

Here are my personal thoughts: There is a lot of work being done in the USA by various federal agencies, coordinated by the US EPA and supported by GreenDelta. This includes reproducible inventory

Dear BONSAI community- The 2020 general assembly will be held on Thursday, and is open to all paid members of BONSAI. Remember, active members qualify for a reduced enrollment rate of €50 - it

1) I saw that tweet from the current CEO Of Microsoft owned GitHub, and even CDNET seems to know from "internal sources" at github that it was not just a tweet. >

Hi Tomas, I think I can reassure you on practical issues: 1) so Github is already working on this: https://twitter.com/natfriedman/status/1271253144442253312?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw 2) the rename is

Dear All, I totally understand the reason behind the wish to change names. Now, beware that: > The default branch name in Git is master. git-scm.com/book so, every time we create a new repo, or

I agree; I think 'main' actually is more precise (master has the connotation of dominance, irrespectively of the imperialist etymology)

Thanks for the support Massimo! To be honest me neither, but alas the fact that *we* don't do that association is quite at the core of the matter. As you say, it is definitely not about what we mean

To be completely honest, I had never before this mail associated the word “master-branch” to the master/slave relationship. But I can see some can make this association and find the name

Hi all, I would like to propose we change branch names in our github repositories away from `master`. Here some more pointers about this proposal. ``` Language and words have a power and,

Amazing, thanks a lot! --- Matteo Lissandrini Department of Computer Science Aalborg University http://people.cs.aau.dk/~matteo ________________________________________ Sent: 05 May 2020

The VM was blocked in a reboot cycle. I will investigate later why. After rebooting the VM, I triggered a new build ( #50 ) and it passed, I'm now verifying the state of the services.