Hi everyone Stefano and I were having a discussion on the current and prospective conversion of Exiobase to RDF. Last week we concluded that we will not include the location on flowobject in the

Maybe better go for the official: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/cpc Bo Den 2019-10-30 kl. 15.57 skrev Bo Weidema: --

CPC product classification is here: http://www.statistics.gov.rw/publication/customized-central-product-classification-cpc although I am unsure if it is a Rwandan customization? Bo

Thank Miguel! --- Matteo Lissandrini Department of Computer Science Aalborg University http://people.cs.aau.dk/~matteo

Thanks Konstantin, really appreciated, where are this tables from? Best wishes, Matteo --- Matteo Lissandrini Department of Computer Science Aalborg University http://people.cs.aau.dk/~matteo

Hi Mateo I can give it a go for the isic section, that should be straight forward. I have many nace rev 2 activities “mapped” to exiobase activity names, reverse it to get the section should

Hi. I am currently on sick-leave but I can send you tables we used during the compilation on Friday/start next week. Best Konstantin

Thanks Bo, Miguel, do you think you can help me materialize this high-level correspondence table then? Also, this is for activity or flow objects? We would need both.. Thanks, Matteo --- Matteo

Hi This is an open issue https://github.com/BONSAMURAIS/Correspondence-tables/issues/10 The correspondence between exiobase activities and isic “codes” does not exist. It is not trivial

It "covers" in the sense "includes" all economic ("industrial") activities, but Exiobase may in some cases be more detailed, in which case this is just an additional hierarchical level. In

Thanks Bo, it seems this does not cover all that we have in Exiobase though...? --- Matteo Lissandrini Department of Computer Science Aalborg University http://people.cs.aau.dk/~matteo

He, he, ideally they would be in our correspondence table collection... But here: https://sdmx.org/wp-content/uploads/CL_ACTIVITY_ISIC4_1.0.xls Bo

That would be great, where do I find them? --- Matteo Lissandrini Department of Computer Science Aalborg University http://people.cs.aau.dk/~matteo

Hi Matteo, Would it not be smartest to use the top categories from one of the classifications, such as ISIC4? Best regards Bo Den

Sorry, now is open to anyone for comment, let me know your email for edit acces. Thanks, Matteo --- Matteo Lissandrini Department of Computer Science Aalborg

Could you please provide access to the document? \Agneta

Hi all, as mentioned already to some of you, I'm working on a tool that helps people without SPARQL know-how to explore large RDF data (like our Bonsai triplestore) This tool works best when the

Dear Chris and BONSAI group, This is a great suggestion to put some effort into briefing each other on our activities in building open data and models for LCA and brainstorm about how we and where we

Dear Chris and all, thank you for raising these points, I have the impression this is an important discussion for bonsai. I need to say that I was not so active in bonsai because in my view it

My impression is that right now we are still in a very pilot stage, due to various reasons: volunteer work, relatively recent initiative, few meetings, very decentralized and slow decision making