|
Milestone: Data and workflow reached first stable and tested version
#dataliberation
#exiobase
#ontology
#rdf
#toolbox
Congrats :) I am really looking forward to linking it to some characterisation factors and give a try to produce some impact assessment scores. Have a nice weekend! Miguel
Congrats :) I am really looking forward to linking it to some characterisation factors and give a try to produce some impact assessment scores. Have a nice weekend! Miguel
|
By
Miguel Fernández Astudillo
· #277
·
|
|
Milestone: Data and workflow reached first stable and tested version
#dataliberation
#exiobase
#ontology
#rdf
#toolbox
Hi all, "annuntio vobis gaudium magnum", a.k.a., great news! The BONSAI RDF codebase reached a quite stable and tested stage (more details are provided at the end of the email, don't miss them!) and w
Hi all, "annuntio vobis gaudium magnum", a.k.a., great news! The BONSAI RDF codebase reached a quite stable and tested stage (more details are provided at the end of the email, don't miss them!) and w
|
By
Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)
· #276
·
|
|
Resource:
#ontology
#rdf
#communication
Hi all, I think this is really a well made guide. We should probably collect useful introductory materials about RDF, LCIA, and other topics interesecting the BONSAI project. “An easy-to-read guide fo
Hi all, I think this is really a well made guide. We should probably collect useful introductory materials about RDF, LCIA, and other topics interesecting the BONSAI project. “An easy-to-read guide fo
|
By
Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)
· #275
·
|
|
CI Deploy failed
#infrastructure
#rdf
#ontology
Amazing, thanks a lot! --- Matteo Lissandrini Department of Computer Science Aalborg University http://people.cs.aau.dk/~matteo ________________________________________ Sent: 05 May 2020 15:15:09 To:
Amazing, thanks a lot! --- Matteo Lissandrini Department of Computer Science Aalborg University http://people.cs.aau.dk/~matteo ________________________________________ Sent: 05 May 2020 15:15:09 To:
|
By
Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)
· #253
·
|
|
CI Deploy failed
#infrastructure
#rdf
#ontology
The VM was blocked in a reboot cycle. I will investigate later why. After rebooting the VM, I triggered a new build ( #50 ) and it passed, I'm now verifying the state of the services.
The VM was blocked in a reboot cycle. I will investigate later why. After rebooting the VM, I triggered a new build ( #50 ) and it passed, I'm now verifying the state of the services.
|
By
tomas Navarrete
· #252
·
|
|
CI Deploy failed
#infrastructure
#rdf
#ontology
I think we can move to a resource in AAU --- Matteo Lissandrini Department of Computer Science Aalborg University http://people.cs.aau.dk/~matteo ________________________________________ Sent: 05 May
I think we can move to a resource in AAU --- Matteo Lissandrini Department of Computer Science Aalborg University http://people.cs.aau.dk/~matteo ________________________________________ Sent: 05 May
|
By
Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)
· #251
·
|
|
CI Deploy failed
#infrastructure
#rdf
#ontology
* The server is a virtual machine hosted at digitalocean (see screenshot below) * I received a notification on maintenance on the "FRA1" network (where our VM is located) [see text below] * the error
* The server is a virtual machine hosted at digitalocean (see screenshot below) * I received a notification on maintenance on the "FRA1" network (where our VM is located) [see text below] * the error
|
By
tomas Navarrete
· #250
·
|
|
CI Deploy failed
#infrastructure
#rdf
#ontology
I'm on it. -----main@bonsai.groups.io escribió: ----- Para: main@bonsai.groups.io De: "Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)" Enviado por: main@bonsai.groups.io Fecha: 05/05/2020 11:23 Asunto: [bonsai] CI Deploy f
I'm on it. -----main@bonsai.groups.io escribió: ----- Para: main@bonsai.groups.io De: "Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)" Enviado por: main@bonsai.groups.io Fecha: 05/05/2020 11:23 Asunto: [bonsai] CI Deploy f
|
By
tomas Navarrete
· #249
·
|
|
CI Deploy failed
#infrastructure
#rdf
#ontology
https://bukk.it/error.jpg --- Matteo Lissandrini Department of Computer Science Aalborg University http://people.cs.aau.dk/~matteo ________________________________________ Sent: 05 May 2020 11:43:22 T
https://bukk.it/error.jpg --- Matteo Lissandrini Department of Computer Science Aalborg University http://people.cs.aau.dk/~matteo ________________________________________ Sent: 05 May 2020 11:43:22 T
|
By
Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)
· #248
·
|
|
CI Deploy failed
#infrastructure
#rdf
#ontology
The error is quite clear though: unexplained error
The error is quite clear though: unexplained error
|
By
romain
· #247
·
|
|
CI Deploy failed
#infrastructure
#rdf
#ontology
Hi all, Tomas, the automatic deploy of the ontology is failing and we cannot understand why, see here: https://travis-ci.org/BONSAMURAIS/ontology Do you have any idea? Thanks, Matteo
Hi all, Tomas, the automatic deploy of the ontology is failing and we cannot understand why, see here: https://travis-ci.org/BONSAMURAIS/ontology Do you have any idea? Thanks, Matteo
|
By
Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)
· #246
·
|
|
Web Client to access the data
#rdf
#ontology
#infrastructure
Hi all, combined with the access to the provenance data (which will proceed with new improvements soon), we are testing also a simplified web interface for the data. Now if you visit https://odas.aau.
Hi all, combined with the access to the provenance data (which will proceed with new improvements soon), we are testing also a simplified web interface for the data. Now if you visit https://odas.aau.
|
By
Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)
· #202
·
|
|
#rdf #issues #exiobase
#rdf
#issues
#exiobase
Hi, please see my answer below. SM: Yes, transports, insurance, etc. linked to imports are just accounted separately as normal inputs, but non necessarily in the national data. They can also be import
Hi, please see my answer below. SM: Yes, transports, insurance, etc. linked to imports are just accounted separately as normal inputs, but non necessarily in the national data. They can also be import
|
By
Stefano Merciai
· #170
·
|
|
#rdf #issues #exiobase
#rdf
#issues
#exiobase
>>>The trade data appear as imports in the Exiobase use table. Note that this is different from the way it appears in national supply-use tables. I am the only one who got lost? The trade data you ref
>>>The trade data appear as imports in the Exiobase use table. Note that this is different from the way it appears in national supply-use tables. I am the only one who got lost? The trade data you ref
|
By
Massimo Pizzol
· #169
·
|
|
#rdf #issues #exiobase
#rdf
#issues
#exiobase
Den 2019-11-08 kl. 10.59 skrev Chris Mutel: International trade activities, i.e. activities that move use of an export to become an import supply, do need to be FlowObject specific. Each such trade ac
Den 2019-11-08 kl. 10.59 skrev Chris Mutel: International trade activities, i.e. activities that move use of an export to become an import supply, do need to be FlowObject specific. Each such trade ac
|
By
Bo Weidema
· #168
·
|
|
#rdf #issues #exiobase
#rdf
#issues
#exiobase
Hi Chris, trade data is only in the USE tables. The SUPPLY tables just show the production of activities and the location of the outputs is the same of the activities which produce them. Roughly speak
Hi Chris, trade data is only in the USE tables. The SUPPLY tables just show the production of activities and the location of the outputs is the same of the activities which produce them. Roughly speak
|
By
Stefano Merciai
· #167
·
|
|
#rdf #issues #exiobase
#rdf
#issues
#exiobase
Thanks Bo, this is clear and (at least in my opinion) completely consistent with all group decisions. Maybe I just missed it - entirely possible! - but the issue discussions did not seem to have this
Thanks Bo, this is clear and (at least in my opinion) completely consistent with all group decisions. Maybe I just missed it - entirely possible! - but the issue discussions did not seem to have this
|
By
Chris Mutel
· #166
·
|
|
#rdf #issues #exiobase
#rdf
#issues
#exiobase
Hi all, I am not in the position of taking sides. I just want to provide one clarification here. Both options (keep the data as is in Exiobase, or re-aggregate) are compatible with the ontology. I wou
Hi all, I am not in the position of taking sides. I just want to provide one clarification here. Both options (keep the data as is in Exiobase, or re-aggregate) are compatible with the ontology. I wou
|
By
Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)
· #165
·
|
|
#rdf #issues #exiobase
#rdf
#issues
#exiobase
Dear Chris, The issue is not about interpreting or deleting data, but simply to make the import of it consistent with our ontology. The Exiobase SUT data includes two kinds of data 1) inputs and outpu
Dear Chris, The issue is not about interpreting or deleting data, but simply to make the import of it consistent with our ontology. The Exiobase SUT data includes two kinds of data 1) inputs and outpu
|
By
Bo Weidema
· #164
·
|
|
#rdf #issues #exiobase
#rdf
#issues
#exiobase
Sorry, I don't want to be a pain in the ass, but I think we are going a bit down the raod of Stalin's ideological purity here... In an ideal world, we would have separate sources of trade data, and co
Sorry, I don't want to be a pain in the ass, but I think we are going a bit down the raod of Stalin's ideological purity here... In an ideal world, we would have separate sources of trade data, and co
|
By
Chris Mutel
· #162
·
|