Two votes - please participate!
|
Dear all-
1. If you haven't voted for or against BEP 1, please do it now! If not enough people participate, the proposal will automatically fail. 2. We have had a lively discussion on the terminology used in the ontology, and have several different options before us. It would be nice to get a sense of the broader groups preferences through an indicative, though not necessarily binding, vote. When multiple option are present, ranked choice voting (in this case in the form of instant runoff) is a decent polling choice. So please visit the list of candidates: https://github.com/BONSAMURAIS/BONSAI-ontology-RDF-framework/blob/master/Terminology-discussion.md, and reply to this email with your preferences in order by letter, from first to last. For example, here are my personal preferences: BDACFE Please rank all six possibilities, so we can get complete statistics.
|
|
|
|
Massimo Pizzol
DCAFBE
|
|
|
|
Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)
AFDCEB
From: main@bonsai.groups.io [main@bonsai.groups.io] on behalf of Massimo Pizzol via Groups.Io [massimo@...]
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2019 5:19 PM To: main@bonsai.groups.io Subject: Re: [bonsai] Two votes - please participate! DCAFBE
|
|
|
|
Elias Sebastian Azzi
ADCFBE is my current preference.
mvh Elias
From: main@bonsai.groups.io <main@bonsai.groups.io>
On Behalf Of Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)
Sent: den 7 april 2019 17:44 To: main@bonsai.groups.io Subject: Re: [bonsai] Two votes - please participate!
AFDCEB
From:
main@bonsai.groups.io [main@bonsai.groups.io] on behalf of Massimo Pizzol via Groups.Io [massimo@...] DCAFBE
|
|
|
|
FYI:
1. The vote on BEP 1 is trending towards acceptance; the voting will stop if two more people participate and approve. 2. We currently have 5 votes in our nomenclature discussion. Here are the average ranks:
|
|
|
|
DCABFGHE
/Romain
|
|
|
|
Carlos David Gaete <cdgaete@...>
AFCED
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 15:54, Chris Mutel <cmutel@...> wrote: FYI:
|
|
|
|
Massimo Pizzol
DCAFBEGH
"The 'flow' of an 'item' from/to an 'activity'" Is quite close to the way we colloquially talk about these things IMO, e.g. "10 kg of carbon dioxide from electricity production". I know 'item' might be appear too generic, but we have decided that we don't want to accept the mental limitations of predefined categories (like e.g. 'product', 'emission', etc.) so the chosen term actually has to be quite generic to allow us to identify almost everything...
|
|
|
|
Brandon Kuczenski
I'm afraid I do not understand the voting options here- we are selecting from rows in which the final column is always 'activity', so we are choosing terms for the first two columns- but what do those columns signify? general and specific / abstract and concrete? "flow quantity" is not comparable to exchange or elementary flow or anything else in the table so I am at a loss. I do think that any system that doesn't recognize quantities as a distinct class is incomplete, but voting for "F" shows a misconception of what a quantity is. If I were to apply my own perspective, it would be "abstract entity" and "concrete / observed thing" so my votes would be: BGEACDH0. I would prefer "Flowable | Exchange" over "Flowable | Flow" but it is not a choice.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 7:36 AM Massimo Pizzol <massimo@...> wrote: DCAFBEGH -- Brandon Kuczenski, Ph.D. Associate Researcher University of California at Santa Barbara Institute for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Research Santa Barbara, CA 93106-5131 email: bkuczenski@...
|
|
|
|
Matteo Lissandrini (AAU)
Hi Brandon,
I think if you look at the ontology for Flow
and at this example
you will see why I proposed Flow quantity:
in the current definition Flow is subclass of om2:Measure, because it instantiate the measured quantity of something that has been input/output of an activity.
I hope this can clarify a little bit the case.
Cheers,
Matteo
From: main@bonsai.groups.io [main@bonsai.groups.io] on behalf of Brandon Kuczenski via Groups.Io [bkuczenski@...]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2019 7:30 PM To: main@bonsai.groups.io Subject: Re: [bonsai] Two votes - please participate! I'm afraid I do not understand the voting options here- we are selecting from rows in which the final column is always 'activity', so we are choosing terms for the first two columns- but what do those columns signify? general and specific / abstract and
concrete? "flow quantity" is not comparable to exchange or elementary flow or anything else in the table so I am at a loss. I do think that any system that doesn't recognize quantities as a distinct class is incomplete, but voting for "F" shows a misconception
of what a quantity is.
If I were to apply my own perspective, it would be "abstract entity" and "concrete / observed thing" so my votes would be: BGEACDH0. I would prefer "Flowable | Exchange" over "Flowable | Flow" but it is not a choice.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 7:36 AM Massimo Pizzol <massimo@...> wrote:
DCAFBEGH -- Brandon Kuczenski, Ph.D.
Associate Researcher University of California at Santa Barbara Institute for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Research Santa Barbara, CA 93106-5131 email: bkuczenski@...
|
|
|
|
Rutger Schurgers
Hi all,
Back at the office it takes me some time to respond as I’m busy as usual. My preferences:
BACDEHGF
Regards,
Rutger
From:
main@bonsai.groups.io [mailto:main@bonsai.groups.io] On Behalf Of Chris Mutel
Dear all-
|
|
|
|
ACDFGHEB
|
|
|
|
Stefano Merciai
DACBEH
-- Best, S.
|
|
|
|
AECBDFGH
|
|
|
|
BADCFEHG is my choice Not sure if we have a consensus yet on the final terminology
|
|
|